Skip to content
Home ยป Tesla Once Again Defending Itself, Fires Back at Reuters’ Misleading Reporting

Tesla Once Again Defending Itself, Fires Back at Reuters’ Misleading Reporting

Canaccord Genuity just cut his price target on $TSLA from $267 to $234

Tesla is once again defending itself against dubious reporting, this time rebutting a Reuters article with a “wildly misleading headline” alleging widespread issues with Tesla quality and service, check out the tweets.

The Reuters story, titled “Tesla blamed drivers for failures of parts it long knew were defective,” seems to imply Tesla knowingly used faulty parts while deceiving customers. However, Tesla contends the article presents “incomplete and demonstrably incorrect information” by relying on anecdotal claims rather than hard data.

Tesla takes issue with several points in the Reuters report. First, the insinuation that thousands of disgruntled customers exist. In reality, Tesla touts customer retention and satisfaction levels that lead the auto industry.

Next, the featured customer photo depicts a damaged part from a crash, not a defective component. Crash damage falls under insurance, not warranty, as with any automaker.

Tesla also argues its advanced vehicle telemetry can identify emerging issues faster than any competitor, enabling rapid responses and fixes well before problems arise. Yet Reuters frames this as a negative.

Additionally, Tesla claims the report conflates unrelated issues to manufacture a sensationalized narrative not grounded in facts. The company strongly denies any lack of transparency with regulators regarding safety-related matters.

To counter such allegations, Tesla lays out its service principles focused on efficiency, quality, and minimizing customer inconvenience. Technicians are not paid on commission, reducing incentives to overcharge for unneeded repairs, with remote diagnostics and mobile service, most issues can be addressed without customers setting foot in a service center.

Tesla argues that selectively highlighting individual negative experiences does not represent the overwhelmingly positive feedback from its broad customer base. In the company’s view, Reuters cherry-picked data points that align with a predetermined narrative.

By fixating on exceptional cases rather than looking at Tesla’s service objectively, the report presents a distorted portrayal. Tesla maintains an industry-leading commitment to safety, quality service, and the transition to sustainable transportation.

According to Tesla, misleading articles like this Reuters story frequently crop up due to some media outlets’ agendas against the company. But Tesla pledges to stay focused on its principles and customers rather than engage in rhetorical battles.

The Reuters report touched a nerve by questioning Tesla’s service and quality standards. But the company is hitting back hard with data-driven counterpoints to defend its reputation. With two differing perspectives emerging, consumers must weigh the evidence themselves to determine if Tesla’s rebuttal successfully refutes the media’s indictment.